The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
There are two kinds of pie chart illustrate average household financing. The major category have their each certain value measured in percentage.
Based on the circular chart, Housing listed as the dominant outgoing in the first description. While the lowest percentage of the second chart has still higher than a minimum value of a few major category in old time.
It based on the year of 195p0 and 2010. In the first year mentioned above, Housing has extremely score and almost taking the total values with just over seven in Ten. While the other categories took nearly less than a third which has spread in Food 11.2, Education has 6.6, Other took 4.4, with Transportation got 3.3, and Healthcare obtained 2.4.
On the other hand, for the next chart, Housing obtained a discrepancy which had only just under a quarter which placed them in second, Led by Food in the first within nearly more than a third, turning down for the third was Other which had nearly a fifth. There was just under a quarter represented by Transportation, Education, and Healthcare.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-03-21 | nguyen thanh sang | 78 | view |
2022-07-30 | Mostakima Tawrin | 73 | view |
2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
2022-06-05 | quytnee | 84 | view |
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 78
- The three pie charts describe a transition per decade about changes in annual spending by particular UK school The data was measured in percentages 11
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists Travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market 100
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nant outgoing in the first description. While the lowest percentage of the second cha...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich had only just under a quarter which placed them in second, Led by Food in th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, still, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90607734807 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55368176539 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591160220994 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 119.815222322 43.030603864 278% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0979230276075 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061806526974 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916690083839 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738039337212 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664744798679 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.