The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant.
The provided pie charts illustrate the average percentage of each nutritious kinds in three typical meals consumed in the USA.
At first glance, dinner required the largest amounts of two out of three nutrients, namely sodium and saturated fat, while most added sugar was eaten in snacks.
On average, it is noticeable that sodium and saturated fat stood at the first rank in the evening meal, at 43% and 37% respectively. By contrast, added sugar, which accounted for only 23% at dinner, contributed the highest detail to the percentage of it in snacks, at 42%.
Looking at the pie charts in more detail, we can see that there were the same figure for the smallest amount of sodium consumed at breakfast and dinner, which were less than a fifth. Likewise, just 16% saturated fat and 16% added sugar were eaten at breakfast. In addition, the rates of the three types of nutrients seemed quite same at lunch, which formed 29% sodium, 26% saturated fat, and 19% added sugar.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-06 | Tosyne | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | Daniel3003 | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | Daniel3003 | view | |
| 2022-12-27 | samuel961 | view |
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 78
- Some Governments say how many children a family can have in their country should be strictly controlled They may control the number of children someone has through taxes Is It sometimes necessary and right for a government to control the population in thi 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 61
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, likewise, look, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82142857143 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45119596891 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2412071889 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111378958779 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644917546134 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528270525505 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864257177997 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570608188803 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.