The best way to solve world's environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion ?
In recent years, the debate of whether or not augmenting the cost of fuel is the perfect solution to tackle environment-related problems has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although this suggestion appears plausible, there are not without other feasible ways to handle environmental issues.
On the one hand, there are a variety of compelling reasons to explain why governments should increase the cost of fuel. First, by imposing more taxes on fossil fuel cost, governments are able to galvanize their citizens to utilize public transportation. In fact, as people would find it more unaffordable to buy fuel, they have no choice but switching to harnessing the public transit system such as buses, subways, and bicycles, leading to the fact that much less exhaust fumes would be released into the air. Second, companies and factories are the first in line to use alternative energy such as solar, wind and tides due to the rise in fuel cost. This means that factories are inclined to resort to renewable energy in the sense that they would not want to increase the price of their products, lowering the amount of gas emission from factories at bay, and thus slowing down global warming.
On the other hand, other workable approaches should be highly taken into consideration besides the mentioned solution. One of the measures is that governments could lauch several campaigns about the environment to raise citizens' awareness. For example, campaigns could emphasize the detrimental effects of plastic bags and encourage people to use biodegradable products such as farbic bags or bamboo-made straws. In addition, the governments could enact rigid sanctions such as imprisoning for years or money fines on those plants emitting excessive contaminated gas. This means that penalties would act as a deterrent to those plants breaking the laws.
In conclusion, increasing the fuel cost should not be considered as the ultimate solution. By applying other measures such as galvanizing people to consume environmentally-friendly products and imposing stringent laws, the governments could manage this thorny problem at a minimum level.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-17 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-21 | Inpu Nguyen | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-20 | moonlucas | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-10 | NigarM | 64 | view |
| 2020-02-16 | hoakim | 89 | view |
- Everyone should be vegeterians because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary schools Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The best way to solve world s environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
In recent years, the debate of whether or not augmenting the cost of fuel is the perf...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this thorny problem at a minimum level.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, second, so, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35294117647 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05101378579 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582352941176 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9515576257 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123805035297 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471262876642 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462498562336 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867098648101 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511834642566 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.