People who try to acquire more than one skill are more likely to become successful than people who just focus on one skill.
The skill of a person has crucial influence on success in his job. Some people think people who try to acquire more than one skill are more likely to become successful than people who just focus on one skill. However, from my perspective, it depends on the work’s category and the job’s property.
On one hand, trying to acquire more than one skill is important for some careers which need substantial personal interaction every day, such as teachers. To be more concrete, teachers contact with not only students, but colleagues and predecessors. They have to give lessons to students, have discusssions with colleagues and report work to predecessors. Teaching ability and social competence are both required in this work. If the teacher does not have a high ability of education, he is not a qualified teacher; If he does not have a high competence of cooperation, he will feel tough in the teacher’s office. Therefore, trying to acquire more than one skill is of importance sometimes.
On the other hand, focusing on one skill sometimes is extremely significant for some work which need high concentration and accuracy, such as scientists. To be more specific, scientists are supposed to concentrate one project in a period. Developing other skills demands much time and energy which is precious for scientists. Because focusing on one skill, ensure the accuracy of the experiments consumes too much for them. Having a grasp of other skill is virtually a distration for them. There is no need to master things which are not required in their work. On the contrary, if they try to learn other abilities, they probably make many mistakes in their own work because people’s concentration is limited. You should not require worthless things to them anymore. So, focusing on one skill can be crucial and advisable sometimes.
To put it in a nut shell, the statement that people who try to acquire more than one skill are more likely to become successful than people who just focus on one skill cannot hold water. We should put it into concrete jobs because different job’s requirements and properties are different.
- Do you agree or disagree It is better to travel abroad to visit different countries when you are younger rather than when you are older Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 82
- People who try to acquire more than one skill are more likely to become successful than people who just focus on one skill 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- The most important thing the government should do to improve health care is to clean the environment 77
- Nowadays children rely too much on the technology like computers smartphone video games for fun and entertainment playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for the children s development 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03672316384 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81790811555 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488700564972 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5628832802 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.15 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.580166771861 0.236089414692 246% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173251225217 0.076458572812 227% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.261770187041 0.0737576698707 355% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.448673660068 0.150856017488 297% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.234334051298 0.0645574589148 363% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.