The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050.
The line graph illustrates information about the percentage of dweller growth which were divided into four age groups in 1950,1990,2000 and 2050.
Overall, there showed a downward trend in the percentage of people who are in 25-37 years old and over 65 years old, while that of the 0-14 age group and the 38 to 45 age group saw an upward during the period given.
The rate of elderly people 65 aged and beyond gradually increased by 10%, from 60% in 1950 to 70% in 1990, followed by a slight decline to aproximately 65% in 2050. At the same time, that of the 38 to 45 age group showed a double growth from 25% to 45% and contineued to decrease steadily to less than 40% at the end of the given period.
In addition, a steady drop of 10%, from 20% to 10% in the figure for the 25 to 37 age group was recorded from 1950 to 1990, while that of people who were aged 0 to 14 remained constant at around 5%. In the next 50 years, the later exceeded the former in 2000 and contineued to rise slowly to 20% in 2050, while the former showed an opposite trend, falling to 0% in 2050.
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015 67
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 73
- Today TV channels provide man s sport shows more than women s sport shows why Should TV channel give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 78
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 61
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.23188405797 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31330861871 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545893719807 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 22.8673712234 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 146.0 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.5 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208695536219 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110528420077 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561148094464 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13798530211 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606708131178 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.81 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.85 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.