Some companies spend a lot of money on scientific research and use animals for testing. Many argue that this is for a just cause while others say otherwise. Do the advantages of using animals in research outweigh its disadvantages?
Support your answer with specific reasons and examples.
Scientific advancements have always been discovering to improve a human being's life so far. Some people believe that there is nothing wrong with using animals while others are convinced otherwise. I agree that fauna should not be involved in any researches because modern technologies allow to avoid it.
The ecosystem of our planet has many precious aspects which people try to cultivate and one of them is wildlife. Studying a new way to heal a new virus or illnesses scientists use animals to experiment. Many of them not only suffers after the injection or pill which makes them vulnerable but also can die in the process. The American Bureau of Statistics revealed the information about the African savannas that the population of the ancient giraffes has been rapidly decreased for the last ten years. There is a lot of cases when hunters provided unprotected animals for companies that are heartbreaking. This is why no one should abuse the valuable fauna in any terrible path.
Money is one of the most powerful things in the world which can provide almost any resource. Unfourtenaly, some industrial sectors do not try to find another way of testing some of their newest products. Having massive assets can easily afford to avoid nature and reduce the damage that can be caused. If companies had invested in cloning they would have easily copied any creature without any further consequences. In other words, huge amounts of money allow making any scientific attempts more convenient even without animals.
In conclusion, organizations should think about this crucial issue and support other ways of researches because using animals pose a threat of extinction many species.
- Some people think that technology has made our life too complex However other people think that it has made our life easier Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people think that technology has made our life too complex However other people think that it has made our life easier Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatres is a waste of money Government must invest this money in public services instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers What factors do you think influence these decisions Do you think that there is too much emphasis on bad news these days 84
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatres is a waste of money Government must invest this money in public services instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...ays been discovering to improve a human beings life so far. Some people believe that t...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'avoiding'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: avoiding
...rches because modern technologies allow to avoid it. The ecosystem of our planet has...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d reduce the damage that can be caused. If companies had invested in cloning they ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15636363636 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70454530176 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1452062476 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.5333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25398455857 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743787669039 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722912138594 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154363047779 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515394213667 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.