Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
It wouldn't be wrong to assume that both the mentioned characteristics: the ability to make sound moral judgements & maintain respect amongst peers are important traits of a successful leader. But it would be wrong to state that respecting peers is a more effective a parameter because often a leader is supposed to make tough decisions & the quality of maintaining respect towards his/her peers could hinder their capability of making a wise & just decision.
A leader is defined by his/ her ability to lead the mass into achieving a common goal. He/she is the one person whose sole purpose is to ensure high spiritedness, perseverance and co-operativeness amongst his/her team members. It's also their responsibility to resolve conflicts and re-instil a sense of unity if a situation of hostility were to arise. Take, for example, the political leaders of a country, who have pledged to serve the nation and its citizen by strategizing and devising plans for the development of the country. Introducing bills to increase the GDP, improving job opportunities, ensuring education, removing inequality, fighting corruption, all these tasks require clarity of thought, analytical & strategical thinking and sound judgement.
Moreover, the effectiveness of a good leader is revealed in tested times. For example, in times wherein a conflict of interest arises between sections of the community, a decision-maker ( leader ) who sets aside his personal preferences and takes a morally right judgement in resolving the conflict would be held in high esteem than a leader, who in the wake of ensuring respect towards the individual communities involved, takes a rather diplomatic stand.
Although, in certain regards, one could argue that since a leader is representative of a team, he/she might unwittingly be biased towards their team members, hence degrading their ability to make logically & morally sound judgement when stuck at the crossroads of judging their team against another.
Even despite this crossroad scenario, the statement emphasizing that an effective leader is the one who can maintain the respect of his/her peer is to an effect wrong. Rather a leader who, without compromising on their morals and ethics can pronounce a sound judgement is comparatively more sought after.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 66
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
It wouldnt be wrong to assume that both the mentio...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...ativeness amongst his/her team members. Its also their responsibility to resolve co...
^^^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tions of the community, a decision-maker leader who sets aside his personal pref...
^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the community, a decision-maker leader who sets aside his personal preferences ...
^^
Line 9, column 169, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
... of his/her peer is to an effect wrong. Rather a leader who, without compromising on t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1932.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42696629213 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.098954254 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592696629213 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.7174130277 60.3974514979 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.0 118.986275619 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91666666667 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383817135415 0.243740707755 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137812474558 0.0831039109588 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109111499077 0.0758088955206 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208657065229 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108187033923 0.0667264976115 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 14.1392134831 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 48.8420337079 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.81 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.38706741573 121% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.