Some believe that it is good having people with extremely high income in the country, while some think the government should try to limit it.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is often argued that whether having enormous amount of money for particular people is good in society or the government need to create limitations to avoid this. Throughout this essay I will discuss both statements and give my opinion, which favors the latter view.
Those who believe having significantly wealthy individuals in a country usually defend this is a positive development because being able to free in terms of finance can give people freedom to invest in different fields. This situation ultimately may lead to improve country’s income as a whole. For example, Italian car brand Ferrari was created by a rich Italian family for the very need of theirs usage, however the name of the car had spread across the country even beyond the borders relatively soon, after this development the family decided to invest in the car sector by creating Ferrari cars and importing them to people from all over the world.
On the other hand, extreme differences on the distribution of income can create inequalities in society. This is resulted with not every citizens having the same rights. For instance, private universities in Turkey offers two different options to the candidates to get in; The first one is having a sufficient money to pay the fee where the second option is getting a remarkable grade at the university exam. If you are a student with a great enthusiasm to study at that specific university however you could not hit the highest score on the exam and financially your family is not avaible to pay the school feel, you can not get into that college.
To conclude, although having particularly wealthy people who can invest and create new sectors and a country can rise the nation’s wealth, I believe that not disturbing the financial sources evenly can led a tremendous inequalities in society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-25 | mubeccel2020 | 84 | view |
- Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 57
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A person should never make an important decision alone Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones cell phones with Internet access while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why 76
- Although it s a new technology solar energy provides benefits to the entire world First solar energy eliminates our reliance on non renewable fossil fuels Additionally solar energy is non pollutant which makes it better for everyone Finally there is almos 73
- Now more than ever people are aware of the importance of good health Unfortunately many have poor lifestyle habits that are difficult to break It is crucial for people to adopt better physical and dietary routines if they expect to improve their health Wh 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'sufficient money'.
Suggestion: sufficient money
...ates to get in; The first one is having a sufficient money to pay the fee where the second option ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'inequality'?
Suggestion: inequality
...ial sources evenly can led a tremendous inequalities in society.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99346405229 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70388452028 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591503267974 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.7206776613 49.4020404114 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.8 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183288416929 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776754653669 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434223246988 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112648765022 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564248543212 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.