The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode a bicycle in 2011. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented table compares 5 age groups of a certain region in terms of their male and female cyclist proportions in 2011.
Overall, it is evident that the youngest categories had the highest preference for cycling. In addition, riding bicycle was more favorable among women rather than men in all age groups.
Turning into detail, remarkable differences between two sexes were witnessed in the figure for two age groups. Specifically, in comparison to girls aging from 10 to 24, 42.2% of who cycled, the percentage for their male counterpart was significantly lower, with 24.6%. Likewise, in 25-39 sector, the figure for women was also approximately 2 times higher than that of men, with 17.1% and 9.7%, respectively.
Regarding to others categories, 0-to-9-year-old male and female cyclists occupied similar rates, with 50.3% and 51.3% of total population, correspondingly. In contrast, with 12.3% of female and 8.0% of male, cycling was least common among citizens aging from 40 to 59 years old. Meanwhile, with respect to people aging above 60, residents riding bicycle accounted for 18.5% of total women, whereas the number for men was tediously lower, with 13.2%.
- Social media enable people to keep in touch with each other and learn about news events What are the advantages and disadvantages 89
- The information below gives details about the household income and spending on food and clothes by an avarage family in a UK city in 2010 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 84
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie charts below show the main regions that received exports from 3 Latin America countries in 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, regarding, so, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32620320856 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88012474271 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657754010695 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6601843973 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2222222222 5.23603664747 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0946575491695 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422131015416 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429514170448 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0691097732714 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355800432657 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, regarding, so, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32620320856 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88012474271 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657754010695 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6601843973 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2222222222 5.23603664747 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0946575491695 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422131015416 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429514170448 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0691097732714 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355800432657 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.