The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table illustrates the percentages of expenditure that consumers spend on three types of products and services in several nations in the year 2002.
It can be seen clearly from the table, while food/drinks/tobacco was the most popular in Turkey and Ireland, consumers in Italy mainly gave preference to clothing and footwear. The leisure/education category had the lowest percentages in the table.
In Turkey, the figure for food/drinks/tobacco was at the highest position, at 32,14%, which doubled than that in Sweden and Italy. However, the first rank belonged to Italia with 9% of people buying clothing/footwear. In terms of leisure/education, the proportions in all countries were less than 5%.
The percentages of national consumer expenditure in Sweden were the lowest (15,77% for food/drinks/tobacco and 5,4% for clothing/footwear). At the same time, consumers in Spain only spent 1.98% on leisure/education, which was approximately 1% less than other countries.
A hi hi hi hi hi hi
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | .zin@ | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | MiaMia_8786 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minthu vũ | view | |
| 2023-04-13 | anhminhbnvn1 | 84 | view |
- animal human poverty health agree disagree 73
- Both government and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat. This money should be better 78
- Both government and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat. This money should be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree? 78
- The table below shows the number of cars made in Argentina Australia and Thailand from 2003 to 2009 95
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 3, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: hi
...tely 1% less than other countries. A hi hi hi hi hi hi
^^^^^
Line 6, column 3, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'hi hi'.
Suggestion: hi hi
...tely 1% less than other countries. A hi hi hi hi hi hi
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 6, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: hi
...y 1% less than other countries. A hi hi hi hi hi hi
^^^^^
Line 6, column 6, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'hi hi'.
Suggestion: hi hi
...y 1% less than other countries. A hi hi hi hi hi hi
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 9, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: hi
...% less than other countries. A hi hi hi hi hi hi
^^^^^
Line 6, column 9, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'hi hi'.
Suggestion: hi hi
...% less than other countries. A hi hi hi hi hi hi
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 12, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: hi
...ess than other countries. A hi hi hi hi hi hi
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.96540636383 2.65546596893 149% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597402597403 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4568035354 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1111111111 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0774503995687 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346844352114 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504173130944 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0653832001265 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060239868425 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.