Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Entertainment receives a great deal of attention these days and a number of people are playing various types of games. Some people opine that taking part in sports that require team work is better; however, others believe that it is more beneficial to play individual sports. In my view, one should partake in games that are played alone because not only does it help an individual to learn how to combat difficult circumstances but they also receive all the prize money. On the one hand, some individuals are of the opinion that playing sports that are played in teams, such as football, is more advantageous. This is because of the fact that while playing team matches, the participants engage in teamwork and learn how to form meaningful relations with others. When a person plays in a team, they learn how to support others to move ahead in life, which is an important trait that every individual needs to acquire. Furthermore, they know what they need to do in order to develop relationships in society. Thus, team sports help people to become more active participants. On the other hand, the supporters of the latter view say that playing individual sports, like swimming and tennis, is more beneficial for a person. The argument they put forward is that when a person plays alone, they face all the difficult circumstances alone, and, thus, learn how to overcome them without any support from another person. Besides, in case of a win, all the credit is received by the one who works hard. However, if a person plays in a team, despite working harder than other players, they might not receive their due credit as it is divided between all the team members. This is why playing sports that require no teams is more useful. In conclusion, sports have become an important aspect of our lives as the number of people playing some kind of sport is increasing. While there are some people who say that it is better for a person to take part in team sports, others are of the view that sports that require no teamwork should be played. I believe that playing individual sports brings more benefits, as a person receives all the prize money and learns to move ahead in life without any outside support.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-30 | selenophile | 56 | view |
- In many parts of the world there are now more multi generational households e g where grandparents live with parents and children than in the past What do you think are the reasons for this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 14
- Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field as long as they are playing well 84
- There are many advertisements directed at children Parents argue that children are misled while advertisers consider advertising a source of useful information What is your opinion 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- There is a moral necessity today for the richer countries of the world top help the poorer countries develop in terms of feeding the population education and health care 41
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 620, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...football, is more advantageous. This is because of the fact that while playing team matches, the partici...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.0 286% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 3.15609756098 634% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 5.60731707317 606% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 965.302439024 188% => OK
No of words: 385.0 196.424390244 196% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72207792208 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 3.73543355544 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49324403381 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 106.607317073 172% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475324675325 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.0 283.868780488 197% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.923279973 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.625 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0625 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 3.70975609756 377% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330504696647 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129796111415 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110609621223 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.330504696647 0.15604864568 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.