The chart gives information about the number and purposes of trips made by men and women in one year in a certain European country. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates and compares travelling patterns of both genders divided into six reasons in a particular European country in the year 2007.
Overall, males travelled more than females in terms of day trips, sport and entertainment, and working purposes, while the opposite was true for the remaining reasons. It is also of note that commuting to work was the major travelling reason for men, meanwhile women were most likely to go shopping.
The largest number of trips made by males, at 300, was to travel to work, being nearly double the figure for their female counterparts, registering the biggest gender gap. A similar travelling pattern was seen in sport and entertainment, and day trip, the least common travelling reason, in which figures for the former, at 70 and 60 trips, respectively, were twice as much as those for the latter.
By contrast, shopping was the main reason for a majority of trips made by women at 260, which was 40 trips more than their opposite sex. This same gender gap was witnessed in bringing children to school, yet with figures being considerably lower (below 150 trips). Finally, both genders made relatively comparable travels regarding visiting friends, at approximately 160 trips.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-31 | susudoantrinh | 78 | view |
- The maps show the changes to Liverpool John Moores University from 2010 to 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- The maps show the changes to Liverpool John Moores University from 2010 to 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 56
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps show the changes to Liverpool John Moores University from 2010 to 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- The chart gives information about the number and purposes of trips made by men and women in one year in a certain European country Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for a majority of trips made by women at 260, which was 40 trips more than their ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, regarding, so, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10891089109 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74405721783 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638613861386 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6524051889 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0902345710767 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046712376074 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406545859192 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0647935465723 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281079709294 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.