the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates and compares spending pattern on three different items among five particular countries i the year 2002.
Overall, Turkey was home to the largest spending on most of the items, except for clothing and footwear. It is also of note that while food, drink, and tobacco predominated in consumer expenditure, the opposite was true for leisure and education.
Regarding food,drink, and tobacco, 32.14% of an Turkish's income was spent on this category the largest percentage by far, followed by the figure for those in Ireland, at 28.91% and being considerably higher than the expenditure, at around 16% in the remaining countries. similarly, expenditure on leisure and education was the greatest in Turkey where an average spending was 4.35%, being twice as much as that in Ireland and Spain, at 2.21% and 1.98%, respectively. Meanwhile, the amount of money went on this item was relatively equal between Italy and Sweden, with 3.22% for the latter, being 2% higher than the former.
By contrast, Italy topped the chart, at 9% in terms of spending pattern on clothing and footwear, while Swedish consumers were least likely to purchase these items, accounting for 5.4% of their income. Finally, spending proportion ranging from 6.51% to 6.63% belonged to the remaining countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-25 | MiaMia_8786 | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | Nguyen Thi Thanh Xuan | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | Hanabi | 11 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | Hanabi | 11 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | KayVu | 84 | view |
- the bar chart below shows the most important causes of stress for different age groups in Canada Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- The maps show the changes to Liverpool John Moores University from 2010 to 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 56
- The maps show the changes to Liverpool John Moores University from 2010 to 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps show the changes to Liverpool John Moores University from 2010 to 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , drink
...r leisure and education. Regarding food,drink, and tobacco, 32.14% of an Turkishs inc...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ding food,drink, and tobacco, 32.14% of an Turkishs income was spent on this categ...
^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similarly
... around 16% in the remaining countries. similarly, expenditure on leisure and education w...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, regarding, similarly, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24038461538 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73394993526 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620192307692 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0454357781 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.25 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108850592463 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572741738518 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796791402956 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956451722245 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984568273601 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.