The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The given table provides data regarding proportions of spending by people on various items in five different nations in 2002.
Overall, Food/ Drinks/ Tobacco took the most money spent, while clothing/ footwear being a second and leisure/ education made up the least.
Regarding food/ drinks/ tobacco, Turkey’s citizens spent most of their income on it, making up nearly one-third of their spending, with Ireland being a close second, standing at 28.91 percent. Swedish spent the least amount of money on this category with roughly a half of that of Turkey. Not so far from Swedish were people in Spain and Italy, accounting for 18.80 and 16.36 percent respectively.
In terms of less spent categories, clothing/ footwear was the most attractive to Italian, making them spend 9 percent of their revenue on this, whereas this was the least attractive to Swedish. This was followed by consumers’ expenditure in Turkey, Spain, and Ireland with generally equal figures (6.63%, 6.51%, and 6.43% respectively). Turning to leisure/ education, Turkey one more time took first place, with Italy and Sweden being close behind. With a figure of approximately half of Turkey’s, the Spanish spent the least money on this section.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-25 | MiaMia_8786 | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | Nguyen Thi Thanh Xuan | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | Hanabi | 11 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | Hanabi | 11 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | KayVu | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 89
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006 89
- The graph below shows the population figures for different types of turtles in India from 1980 to 2012 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 84
- the graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...that of Turkey. Not so far from Swedish were people in Spain and Italy, accounting f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30256410256 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62499992173 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620512820513 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0643148064 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.888888889 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0684167469334 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346555341295 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702560122061 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0680809999981 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939537332226 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.