The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend on doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 and 2007
The given bar chart illustrates weekly hours that Chester’s youngsters spend on doing specific activities over 5 years between 2002 and 2007.
Overall, watching television was the most enjoyable activity throughout the period, whereas the number of hours spent on bowling was the least. An eventual increase was reported entertaining activities, namely going to pubs/ discos, watching television, and shopping, while doing homework and sport showed an inverse trend and watching DVDs and bowling’s figure varied over time.
Although got steadily increased, entertaining activities also plateaued for 2 to 3 years. Most notably was watching television with only 25 hours initially and skyrocketed in 2005, reaching 35 hours and slightly grew in the remaining years. Interestingly, going to pubs/ discos didn’t grow much in almost the entire period, but escalated to roughly 18 hours in the final year. Similarly, 7 hours were spent on shopping initially and rose to 15 hours in the end.
On the contrary, while doing homework only got steady decline over time, doing sport drastically dropped in the final years, ended the period at 2 and 7 hours spent respectively. Regarding those fluctuated, watching DVDs rose at first and reached its peak at approximately 17 hours, after which it fell down to 10 hours. Likewise, bowling started at 3 hours but ended with the lower figure at 2 hours.
- The graph below shows the population figures for different types of turtles in India from 1980 to 2012 78
- the graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 75
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006 89
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 89
- The two maps below show the road access to the hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, likewise, regarding, similarly, so, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29596412556 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80528310588 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605381165919 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0395381859 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.1 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203069866779 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088311219502 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118974009733 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165675146303 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157984698657 0.0819641961636 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.