The two maps below show the road access to the hospital in 2007 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams illustrate significant changes in ways to enter the city hospital in three years, from 2007 to 2010.
Overall, it was difficult to enter the hospital at first but later became easier because of the added infrastructure. Similarly, the other facilities were constructed, making accession to the hospital more convenient and comfortable.
In 2007, there had been only one main road towards the hospital, with several bus stops along the two sides. To the east of the hospital road, the staff and public had to share the same car park, which could only be entered through from a ring road surrounding the building.
However, considerable changes had happened by 2010. To support the traffic, two roundabouts were added in order to prevent congestion. Furthermore, people then could enter the hospital from the second channel through the new bus station, which was composed of those former bus stops. It also became more pleasant for drivers to access the hospital because there was no need to share the car park anymore as the new public car park had been built to the east of the ring road.
- the graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 75
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016 73
- The two maps below show the road access to the hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 245, Rule ID: WAS_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprised' or 'consisted of' or 'was composed of'?
Suggestion: comprised; consisted of; was composed of
...nnel through the new bus station, which was comprised of those former bus stops. It also became ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, similarly, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97849462366 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60130618133 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.89647096 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.888888889 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175668806527 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745419840933 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376510793517 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11162415784 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183232314503 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.