The chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 and 2007.
The line chart gives information, how much hours youngsters in Chester devote to 7 different events in 7 days between 2002 and 2007.
Overall, the most popular activity over the time was watching TV, whereas bowling have experienced the least favorite.
At the beginning of the period, adolescents spent 25 hours in 2002 which inclined to the peak in end of the period which was almost 37 hours. Shopping was 7hours in 2002 which got more than doubled in last year. In 2002, the youngsters spent approximately 8hours going to discos and pubs after five years it climbed up to 18hours.
On the other hand homework occupied 10 hours which fall to about 7hours. Doing sports fall from 10hours to 3hours from 2002 till 2007. In all the entire period bowling was under 5hours and it quitted on almost 1hours at the end. Over 10hours were dedicated to watching DVDs in the start but it reached to the top over 15 hours in 2002 and 2007 and in the final year it came back to 10 hours.
- The table below shows consumer spending on different items in 5 countries in 2002 73
- Many students take part time jobs while studying in university Is this good idea or bad idea 73
- Some parents are worried about the increasing level of violence in TV video games and other types of entertainment for children s leisure How does this affect children How do you think this problem can be tackled 77
- Some think that cars are best way to travel in a city others think bicycle is better Discuss both points of views and give your opinion 56
- Some people agree with spending lots of money on a large wedding while others think it is a waste of money What is your opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
The line chart gives information, how much hours youngsters in Chester devote to 7...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55367231638 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28262571592 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604519774011 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.379967379 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5555555556 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201638094254 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821900849599 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763233212556 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116746627197 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657964373476 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.