The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
The line chart compares three different companies in terms of their waste output between the years 2000 and 2015.
It is clear that all three companies experienced significant changes in waste production throughout the 15 years. Overall, the amounts of waste discharged by companies A and B both declined considerably, whereas company C’s waste output increased dramatically.
In 2000, company A produced 12 tonnes of waste, which was remarkably higher than the figures for companies B and C, at only 8 and 4 tonnes respectively. By 2005, the amounts of toxic waste released by companies B and C had fairly rose by 2 tonnes, while company A had reduced their waste output to approximately 11 tonnes over the same period.
From 2005 to 2015, there was a plummet of roughly 7 tonnes in company B’s waste production, followed by a moderate decrease of about 3 tonnes in company A’s. By contrast, company C’s waste output soared, surpassing the others at 10 tonnes of waste, while the respective amounts of waste produced by company A and B were 8 and 3 tonnes at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-13 | Wardiati Yusuf | 60 | view |
| 2023-12-04 | klnhhhh01 | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 89
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status 89
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 73
- The chart shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006 78
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...eleased by companies B and C had fairly rose by 2 tonnes, while company A had reduce...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89304812834 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84710020581 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1730017377 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.714285714 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358083808727 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182752704285 0.103423049105 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509334789289 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229857469647 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034670345289 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.