The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004.
The given bar chart compares doctors and people of different occupational backgrounds in terms of their yearly salary in the year 2004. These workers are categorized by nationalities, including French, Italian, Czech, German, Finnish, Swiss, and American.
In general, doctors fared considerably better than other employees in all seven countries. Additionally, American staff received the most generous amount paid by their employers when compared to other nations’ workers.
Among seven countries, US doctors’ annual income was the highest which amounted to 120 thousand dollars, as opposed to only about 42 thousand dollars for people working in other sectors. Following behind American doctors, French and Swiss physicians generally earned $70 thousand in 2004 respectively. In contrast, the amounts paid for other workers from these two countries were moderately low, at only $35,000 for French and $40,000 for Swiss.
In Italy, Czech Republic, Germany, and Finland, approximately $60 thousand were allocated annually for salary payment to doctors of each nation, which was only half as much as the yearly earnings of those from the US. Other employees from these countries were paid the least, whose income varied around 20 thousand dollars per year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | 1 | 67 | view |
| 2022-04-04 | chonkycat_testbig | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-16 | Ngoc21 | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-16 | Ngoc21 | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-01 | phuongchi17899 | 67 | view |
- Task 2 In countries where there is high unemployment most pupils should be offered only primary education There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 89
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 84
- The chart shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006 78
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60732984293 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72603477423 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65445026178 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1736000841 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344706058265 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128535257584 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746123367134 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188553710474 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919031546266 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.