Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
We have just crossed the threshold of the 21st century and the curtain of the new millennium is slowly rising. In our contemporary world, performing and listening to the music is a nifty vogue amid our communality. Furthermore, it has been consolidating its status as the most prevalent tool of impendence together with unity of promiscuous cultures. Yet in the interim, the dominant role of music has long been a hotbed of spirited debate, not just within the general public, but also in the press as well as the world. As I see it, the boons brought about by the spread of music far outweigh the banes.
Granted, the proliferation of music does not come without drawbacks. First and foremost, it renders individuals, principally, our young generation addicted to listening music. Thereupon, music may be a key element to generate emotive offspring and it is pivotal distractions which can embrangle people from accomplishing their objectives. On the other hand, music can pose a detrimental repercussion to their healthy lifestyle, since it negatively impacts upon their hearing sense as well as entail to make the mind forgetful.
Needless to say, the influx of music can create even greater benefits. To begin with, music is an art form and cultural activity has a unifying effect on people from various countries. In particular, myriad number of individuals to go concerts or music festivals as it can be an opportunity to acquaint with new people along with make friends and share the experiences. Forsooth, music assist people to elevate their blessedness, diminish their melancholy and ameliorate their cognition. Moreover, the music is the productive contrivance of recreation when people listen to the music for the sake of relaxation.
With the above-presented demonstration, I would like to draw my conclusion as follows. In final analysis, I concede that the prevalence of music has created some adverse effects for the healthy lifestyle of numerous people. Nevertheless, its spread has produced more blessings to our lives. On balance, I am convinced that we should sustain the extensive use of music as stimuli to unifications of cultures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Tourism today creates a variety of problems such as pollution due to flights transport and dirty water Governments should impose extra taxes on flights or accommodation to restrict today s tourism industry 82
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- There is a moral necessity today for the richer countries of the world top help the poorer countries develop in terms of feeding the population education and health care 41
- In some countries many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 462, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...of spirited debate, not just within the general public, but also in the press as well as the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as stimuli to unifications of cultures.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, in particular, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19484240688 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06396050211 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595988538682 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8980912217 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.722222222 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3888888889 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190443035967 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570536371451 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440320429402 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107966049055 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671816048216 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.