The provided line graph illustrates detailed information about the proportion of expenditure on the petrol of people from the UK and the USA among the three classes.
At first glance, the United States of America is inversely proportioned in comparison with the United Kingdom in the figure for income spending on petrol. To be more precise, the higher percentages of money in the US, which are paid for gas, the lower rate of this in the UK.
On average, it is noticeable that the figure for the expenditure of the poorest American was approximately 5-fold higher than this in the UK. Nevertheless, there were equal figures in the payment of the richest inhabitants in both countries, which accounts for just under 4% of ones’ wages. Besides, the majority of expenses go to the poorest kind of people paying money for petrol live in the United States, while the amount of currency spending for gasoline of the poorest American contributes to roughly 0.5%.
It is noticeable that in terms of Americans, the poorest ones can be the highest consumers of petrol, at over 5% of their income. The middle-income and the richest only spend nearly 5% and 4% of their earning respectively. The most affluent group of people can use about 4% of their salary for petrol in the UK. Conversely, only at most under 4% and 2.5% of the gasoline users in the penniless and middle financial backgrounds in order.
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 84
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that t 84
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 20
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, conversely, first, nevertheless, so, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84166666667 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75468036057 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3901085461 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.2 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168739309859 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658979977557 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797500290673 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113056168786 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517842863313 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.