Climate change is a concerning global issue. Who should take the responsibilities, governments, big companies or individuals?
Recently, the phenomenon of climate change and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of taking responsibilities is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that global issues can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the governments' role can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that raising earth temperature, as well as melting polar caps, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered environmental degradations. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both governmental legislations and air pollution detectors apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of climatology, big companies and individuals person might increase the consequences of burning fossil fuels. Moreover, fundamental aspects of accurate filtrations relate to this reality that the demerits of global warming pertain to grazing animals than vegetable foods. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of recycling material is correlated negatively with solar energy. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of companies' responsibilities.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of governmental policies far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of powerful global infrastructures prove the significance of climate indicators, but also pinpoint implications of personal conservations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-26 | Janabakhshi | 92 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...say. From a social standpoint, the governments role can provide the society with some ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93436293436 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48314766351 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.698841698842 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7509608549 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.083333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184254452441 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515558004456 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454688876998 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088931203382 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597346997903 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.45 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.