Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development, but some important social values are lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages?
In many parts of the world today, more citizens have been concerned about societies. It is hypothesised that dwellers will probably gain numerous sabotages in some societies if they sustain reinforcing economic issues. This essay attempts to point out that this statement is persuadable in some aspects.
There have been more folks who are in favour of the idea: various crucial aspects of societies would obtain more detrimental prospects due to economic enhancement. First and foremost, some criminal obstacles will be triggered due to these tactics. This can be fathomed that governors of nations do not value sides which relate to securities or territory restrictions. As a result, governments in all probability have more risks of assaults.
As highlight for this point, in VNN channel, in 1950 the government in Vietnam endured a tough period because they compulsorily tackled wars from other countries. Due to the fact that leaders of this nation merely paid attention about economiC problems, and they did not reinforce their military.
Apart from that, sensations of folks have been deleterious affected. It is obvious that the relationships with others have been damaged on the daily basis due to these tenets. Therefore, they have more risks in order to suffer from some mental sicknesses. Concretely, depression is the most common illness to young adults today. A case in this point, following CnN articles, numerous psychologists in Vietnam have demonstrated that spectacles at the moment have mainly triggered metal issues to most youngsters. Besides, dwellers today have DECREASED their incentives in their lives. By virtue of the fact that they perceive stressful in work, and it is difficult for them to alleviate burdens in these prospects. As a bonus, the general economy of countries have no sufficient abilities to reinforce in the long term. It is understood that every sides of societies are beneficial to human. Indeed, communications attribute successes to contracts of enterprises, or incorporations of staff which are created by social techniques can render aids to enterprises to expand widely. This can be demonstrated by new tactics from most firms in the world.
In brief, the statements trigger numerous cognition about issues at the moment.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-09-05 | m_sepahi@ymail.com | 84 | view |
2021-06-24 | vuthuy2210 | 65 | view |
2021-04-21 | minhtrile010@gmail.com | 89 | view |
2020-11-12 | legiabao9 | 61 | view |
2020-11-12 | legiabao9 | 73 | view |
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed What is the reason for doing this Is this a negative or positive development 56
- Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on their planets and messages should be sent to contact them Other scientists think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Some people think that dangerous sport should be banned while others believe that people should be free to choose Discuss both views and your give your opinion 61
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 56
- Does renting a house have more advantages or disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 478, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cles at the moment have mainly triggered metal issues to most youngsters. Besides...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, so, therefore, well, apart from, in brief, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34540389972 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93215679498 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58217270195 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6538801284 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.380952381 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0952380952 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7619047619 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0872820704726 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0256694586326 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0270140584878 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0504053404584 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313820093149 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.