Many old buildings protected by law are part of nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by new ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?
Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
It is true that nowadays some old building’s qualities downgraded seriously. While government promulgated law to protect these buildings, some people claim that they should be destructed and replaced. My essay will analyze some possible causes and I believe that several measures can be taken into account to address this problem.
To begin, there are two reasons to maintain old buildings. With each construction built in the past period, much historical value came along, particularly old architectures and contains unique features of dynasties. Because of that, maintaining these constructions brings the depth of view of past life as well as conserves historical worth. In addition, nowadays, several old building areas are contributing their value to national tourism economics. For instance, according to a survey of Hanoi National University, a number of tourist visiting the old quarters in Vietnam grew over 5 million from 3.5 million per day between 2017 and 2019. Such popular destination is Hoi An, Hanoi 36 Streets which represent life in Nguyen’s reign.
Despite these reasons mentioned above, maintaining old buildings have negative effects on social’s process, particularly people’s living. According to a statistic of Hanoi urban management’s Board, there are 800 million human living in old buildings, whose situation downgraded seriously and people are suffering many problems from weather and risks of awful facilities. They also can not replaced their house because of inconvenient regulations to propose government’s approval.
In my opinion, the government should have some changes to mitigate this situation. They should balance value of history, economics and benefits of their citizens. Some measures can take place such as destructing some unrepeatable buildings, upgrading facilities, easing regulations, responding citizen’s requests and assuring important worth of these old buildings, etc.
In conclusion, it is recognized that old architectures contain great value which we should respect. However, as an evident truth, it clears out the old to make way for the new, therefore, we should create better life in the future. Also, the government should make decisions properly to develop social.
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up untill 2050
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 56
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribute to the company by giving them extra money This practical can act as an incentive for some but may be also have a negative impact on others To what extend is this style of management e 78
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by new ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress Give reasons for your answer 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 675, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'An'?
...d 2019. Such popular destination is Hoi An, Hanoi 36 Streets which represent life i...
^^^
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'replace'
Suggestion: replace
... of awful facilities. They also can not replaced their house because of inconvenient reg...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70746268657 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01829278473 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632835820896 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.246693006 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.222222222 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6111111111 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297851323546 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907543331448 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538958344557 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161587016681 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028061907578 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.