2. The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their Contemporaries.
Greatness is the position one takes in humanity. In essence, greatness of individuals is not necessarily something that people decide about it; Where one makes a contribution for other human beings, the one has shown his/her greatness no matter others have seen him/her or not. But even If there are people who should decide about the greatness of individuals, there are not “only” those who are living after individuals who decide about ones’ outstanding level.
To begin with, there is no requirement of peoples’ decision for one to have greatness or not. Many are those who are unknown by masses and still are among the most valued persons ever came into the world. They stand top in humanity because of the contribution they have made for human beings. For instance, consider many medicine doctors martyrs of wars who were serving soldiers to save them. Many have been died in defending their countries from atrocious attacks of foreigners without remaining any trace of them. There are high valued people who fought against ignorance and were doomed to be killed by being recognized as heretics and they are forever unknown. Therefore, individuals gain the highest positions in humanity without the decision of others because of their contributions.
Even if our intention of greatness of people includes those who are recognized and are not unknown, there is no necessity that future generations decide about the greatness of individuals. When one makes a valued contribution, and such contribution is not far from understanding, even the most common contemporaries can recognize the magnitude standing of that individual properly. Consider Fleming for instance. Having discovered the antibiotic characteristics of a certain fungi, he cured many suffering patients. His outstanding level immediately established among human beings because of the priceless contribution he made for humans. Hence, sometimes individuals can prove their greatness and it is averred both by their contemporaries and future generations.
Nevertheless, greatness of people can be decided better in a crucible of time because more information is provided with the time goes by. For example, a founder of an industry who has provided jobs for local citizens of a city might be regarded as a great founder. When the time goes by, with the pollution and the diseases the industry brings on the local citizens they no more recognize that person as a high-valued individual because overall of his work is shown to be negative. Hence, time can give people better resolution to decide on the standing of individuals.
In short, there is no necessity to resort to the others’ decision in determining ones’ greatness. People who make contributions for human beings are categorized as great ones, regarding the magnitude of their contribution. In cases that others should decide about the greatness of ones, although with the time passing better they can be better judged, but contemporaries also can determine that one is great and future generations aver that.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | Dipper | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | 1172910232 | 50 | view |
| 2016-12-26 | amirbahman | 66 | view |
| 2014-10-31 | siamakd | 60 | view |
| 2014-10-24 | siamakd | 35 | view |
- The following appeared in an editorial in a business magazine Although the sales of Whirlwind video games have declined over the past two years a recent survey of video game players suggests that this sales trend is about to be reversed The survey asked v 86
- 2.Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people 80
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 80
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. (4) 50
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes litt 75
flaws:
The essay is not exactly right on the topic. You changed the topic: In short, there is no necessity to resort to the others’ decision in determining ones’ greatness.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: ? out of 6
Category: ? Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 487 350
No. of Characters: 2495 1500
No. of Different Words: 213 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.698 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.123 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.877 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 179 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 133 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 104 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 74 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.174 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.82 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.609 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.299 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.494 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.092 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5