The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2015.
The pic charts compare the proportions of different age groups in two countries in 2000 and the anticipation for 2050.
It is noticeable that Yemen and Italy have different main populations in terms of age groups in 2000 but will own the same largest age people in the prediction for 2050. By contrast, both countries keep the different smallest age groups the same over the 50-year period.
In 2000, people who were birth to 14 years old contribute more than half of the population of Yemen while nearly two-thirds of Italian was 15 to 59 years old. In Yemen, the age group of 15 to 59 years ranked the second largest population with 46.3% of all people, following with only 3.6% of people who can live over 60 years old. There was 24.4% of people in Italy were older than 60 years old and only 14.3% of people were younger than 14 years old.
It is predicted that people who are aged over 15 to 59 years old consisted of the main population for both Yemen and Italy in 2050, with the proportion of 57.3% and 46.2% respectively. The size of the population who are over 60 years old will increase significantly in Italy to 42.3% and will reach 5.7% of all people in Yemen with a relatively slow increasing rate. The proportion of children under 14 years old would fall a little bit in Italy to 11.5% and decrease dramatically in Yemen by around 13 points.
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding 78
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
- the diagram below shows how raw materials are used to make plastic products
- It is difficult for people who live in cities to get enough physical exercise What are the causes and what solutions could be taken to solve the problem 78
- 7 The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 427, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...hildren under 14 years old would fall a little bit in Italy to 11.5% and decrease dramatic...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53441295547 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48365305782 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.7749891399 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.444444444 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4444444444 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215269958931 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11971435887 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780638179585 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168548576424 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478256549553 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.