The line chart illustrates data on the changes in the electricity generation from various sources (coal, natural gas, and petroleum) supplied to New York City over two decades, starting from 1980.
Overall, petroleum exploitation for electricity was by far the largest among other forms of energy. Additionally, there was a significant increase in electricity production from natural gas, while the opposite was true for the case of coal throughout the observed period.
More specifically, petroleum had the highest electricity generation in 1980, with roughly 350 million kW hours, reaching a peak of 600 million kW hours in 1985. It, however, experienced a sharp decrease to the initial figure before rising substantially by over 300 million kW hours at the end of the period.
On the other hand, natural gas generated the least amount of electricity in the first five years, remaining stable at around 100 million kW hours, followed by a significant climb to over 450 million kW hours in 1995. This figure slightly rose by 50 million kW hours during the last five years.
Meanwhile, the figure for coal increased steadily between over 200 and 300 million kW hours in 1980 and 1985, respectively. This figure, however, gradually fell and remained constant at about 200 million kW hours in 2000.
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 80
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015. 84
- The bar chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman. 73
- The graph shows the percentage of overweight men and women in Australia between 1980 and 2010. 78
- Task 2 Some employers find that their new employees lack in basic interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes of this problem Suggest solutions 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19431279621 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81670534128 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57345971564 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6594797977 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.777777778 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140553397003 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630742765804 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790394324514 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943257772011 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927499871177 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.