Some people think that rich countries should support poor countries in terms of aid for health care and education. To what extend do you agree?
It is thought among a few that wealthy countries have greater responsibilities towards less developed nations in the form of developing their health care system as well as education. I fully agree with these concepts through experts exchange programs in treatment section and providing scholarship for tertiary level of education.
Experts exchange programs can be forwarded by creating mutual opportunities for health care professionals to visit each other working facilities and working on those facilities for a time being to exchange skills. To carry forward programs like these financially advanced counties should provide logistics to persons who have strong motivation to work in under developed countries. They can also arrange extra job facilities in their host countries whole are entitled with volunteer experiences. On the other hand, health workers from poor economic states should get offer to visit advance facilities of health care in strong economic conditions countries.
Scholarship opportunities should gain the most priority for inter countries educational support programs. In this process, meritorious students, who are potential asset for economically challenging counties as they would be future leader of those countries, owing to come back to develop their mother land. In contrast, they can show their creativity in a suitable and competitive environment that might be only available to the healthy GDP owners. A bilateral trust and cooperation would emerge if this kind of healthy relationship persists among totally opposite economic zone countries.
In conclusion, Counties with opposite economic profiles should build a bridge by assist in health care and educational promotion which will not only gear the economically marginalize countries development but economically solvent countries will get output in the name of fame and discovery of talented individuals also. The world is a global village now so no opportunity should be restricted by the bracket of economy.
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development but some important social values are lost as a result Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh disadvantages 78
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development but some important social values are lost as a result Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh disadvantages 78
- Some people think that rich countries should support poor countries in terms of aid for health care and education To what extend do you agree 84
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development but some important social values are lost as a result Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pment but economically solvent countries will get output in the name of fame and ...
^^
Line 4, column 316, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...e and discovery of talented individuals also. The world is a global village now so n...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68666666667 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02176548836 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603333333333 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.7732036117 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.166666667 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196715491321 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733992410087 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661425352552 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121517954589 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208267748611 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.