WORLD GOVERNMENTS SHOULD CONDUCT SERIOUS CAMPAIGNS AGAINST SMOKING? DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE?
Authorities acquire the capacity to impose diverse crucial developments in numerous people’s life aspects. Obviously, the most significant dimension in human being associates with basic hygiene so whether or not governments run an anti-smoking movement is depended on their policies. Anyway, this is the writer’s opinion; entirely concur with the idea that governments must set out an anti-smoking campaign through disciplined arrangements that definitely eventuate in the case elimination. The essay will explain why.
First, setting a program to launch an effective plan against smoking requires finance and no organization except the official treasury system has the potential of. Nevertheless, fiscal aids that appear the fundamental campaign core could be easily undertaken by the long-sighted policy. Authoritative revenues rely on different tax resources to supply governmental budgets therefore if a government determines to fight against tobacco, a staggering sum will be discarded from tax resources, on the other hand, Copious medical investigations have shown abundant lethal or toxic substances exist in tobacco that can lead to a variety of chronic disease requiring plenty of national funds to research and treat about. Although, the majority of these diseases, despite immeasurable medical expenditures, are incurable. For instance, lung cancers, heart disease, and osteoporosis dominantly interrelate with heavy-smoking. Thus and so, while money is eagerly collected in vast sums with one hand, it is consumed in increasingly vaster sums with the other. ultimately, with a logical calculation, a government accomplishes smoking tax isolating without being economically hurt plus countless valuable lives will be saved.
Second, governments' potentials like the capacity to legislate and execute a law potent them to protect their people’s lives at different levels such as health. For a start, officials can issue institutional regulations to ban the whole tobacco and cigarette advertising and then conduct anti-smoking campaigns of their own. Taking the cigarette advertisement banning on public television, some years ago, ruled out by the courageous president of the united states of America Jhon.F.Kennedy as an influential example. Moreover, pragmatic efforts must be made to inform young people especially about the dire consequences of embracing the habit. In addition, a governmental conceivable step is, that smoking should be prohibited in all public places namely airports, subways, and so on. As individuals, we are certainly weak but if governments act courageously and honestly, they can protect us from smoking countercoups. Finally, government facilities assist them to strengthen their efforts to conclude opium and tobacco smoking as anti-social behaviors so then manage a critical commitment in preventing the fiasco.
In conclusion, governments dominant capacities including legislative and executive branch plus the potential to financial balance make it expectable to be responsible against social complications like a smoking disaster
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | jimHsu | 76 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 80 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Job has a more significant effect on your overall than social life dies 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money supporting the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays more and more people spend too much money on their pets dogs cats and others although there are better uses for this money 82
- Some people prefer to go and visit tourist attractions where there are many tourists others like the ones with fewer people Which one do you select 76
- WORLD GOVERNMENTS SHOULD CONDUCT SERIOUS CAMPAIGNS AGAINST SMOKING DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... being associates with basic hygiene so whether or not governments run an anti-smoking movemen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 919, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...inantly interrelate with heavy-smoking. Thus and so, while money is eagerly collecte...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1052, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ultimately
...ncreasingly vaster sums with the other. ultimately, with a logical calculation, a governme...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 481, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: F
...nt of the united states of America Jhon.F.Kennedy as an influential example. More...
^
Line 5, column 483, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Kennedy
... of the united states of America Jhon.F.Kennedy as an influential example. Moreover, pr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, finally, first, honestly, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2642.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92376681614 4.8611393121 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26815700482 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 295.0 212.727598566 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661434977578 0.524837075471 126% => OK
syllable_count: 831.6 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.51630824373 125% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.6413383028 48.9658058833 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.052631579 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4736842105 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.31578947368 5.45110844103 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164807229877 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455359496266 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396105278544 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102224066867 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160114818513 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 11.7677419355 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 58.1214874552 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 10.9000537634 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.08 8.01818996416 138% => OK
difficult_words: 178.0 86.8835125448 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.