The threat of nuclear weapons maintain war peace. Nuclear power provide clean and cheap energy.
The benefits of nuclear energy far outweigh the disadvantages.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is obvious that nuclear power is certainly which is often discussed in present’s world. Moreover, a day to day nuclear energies types are provided by countries for their economics and politics. I agree with the statement that nuclear energies sources more useful and more environmental friendly compare to others types of fossil fuels and it has a longer life than other consumptive resources. However, it is opposed by some that nuclear powers could be dangerous for countries it is because not always safe to people’s lives. Although a tiny fault can be a cause of big health problems.
Firstly, the global warming is one of the main problems in the world and it is being affected mostly by fossil fuels.On the other hand, nuclear energies reduce the greenhouse gas emission rather than fossil fuels. In short, our general lifestyle hampered by fossil fuels gases whereas the environment is not damaged by nuclear powers.To continues with, some energy resources are decreasing day by day because of the world population raising. Nuclear power is one of the considerable resources which it has more a longivity than the others. Therefore countries should encourage nuclear energies.
On the other hand, it is believed that creations of nuclear weapon threaten the world peace. For instance, a discussion about nuclear power does not finish yet in between North Korea and the USA. Moreover, nuclear powers which contains radioactive and it can be harmful for the environment. Due to the fact that, nuclear energy usage should be limited.
In conclusion, there is a strong debate about nuclear powers usages and some suggest that it should use for countries economies and the world environment health. At the same time, it is argued by others that world peace is can be affected by nuclear weapons utilisations and also it could be dangerous for the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-17 | tahmeed1993 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion. 56
- Today, the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions. 78
- Today culture is becoming more or less similar all around the world. Is it a positive or negative trend? 84
- Some people believe it is better to study subjects that have practical applications Others however think it is better to study subjects that are theoretical Discuss both views 42
- Public libraries should only provide books and should not waste their limited resources on expensive high-tech media such as software, videos or DVDs. Do you agree or disagree? 22
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 531, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ause not always safe to people’s lives. Although a tiny fault can be a cause of big heal...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...s being affected mostly by fossil fuels.On the other hand, nuclear energies reduce...
^^
Line 2, column 334, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...onment is not damaged by nuclear powers.To continues with, some energy resources a...
^^
Line 2, column 540, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...t has more a longivity than the others. Therefore countries should encourage nuclear ener...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07817589577 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66778624901 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504885993485 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1577941451 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.933333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280427328098 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115463894325 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391013306677 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197145039647 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434414040578 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.