It is said that an increasing number of people, particularly the youths, prefer interacting with other people through the Internet to meeting directly. While there are some reasons explaining the advantages of socializing online, I argue that it is a negative development.
On the one hand, there are different benefits for Internet users who like to socialize through social medias. Firstly, using the Internet to interact allows the users to broaden their own knowledge about different fields and their communities through chatting. For example, I am able to hear, speak, read and write the English language constantly because of my friend who is American. This helps me to save a great deal of money to learn English. Secondly, socializing online creates choices to make friends all over the world in spite of geography gaps. Gaps used to be barriers for inhabitants between two countries to get well known about each other culture, however, social medias have capability to solve this drawback.
On the other hand, people may suffer a lot of mental and psychological problems. One disadvantage is that abusing Internet makes everyone face to high risk of headache, heart attack and blood pressure. Electronic waves from computers and wifi devices have negative impacts on human's health and mind. For example, a youtuber, called Quynh, have become obese because of sitting in front of computer 12 hours per day. Another drawback is not knowing people's real attitudes. People cannot understand friends' personalities in real life because they communicate through words, not face to face meetings. Consequently, there will have gaps between their friendship. Last but not least, socializing online easily put the youths to be on the defensive in any event.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that the disadvantages of interacting online outweigh be advantages.
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010
- In most successful organisations some people believe that communication between managers and workers is important while other people said that other factors are more significant What is your opinion 84
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...d wifi devices have negative impacts on humans health and mind. For example, a youtube...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...uter 12 hours per day. Another drawback is not knowing peoples real attitudes. People cannot u...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28903654485 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80791634704 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63122923588 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6395136424 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6470588235 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58823529412 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170330665775 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491340215357 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438251330716 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915591812458 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592887234236 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.