The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
Table: https://ielts-simon.com/.a/6a0120a5bb05d8970c015434c9f23f970c-pi
The table gives information about the percentage of people from six household types living below the poverty line in Australia in the year 1999.
Overall, the percentage of sole parents and single with no children were the highest groups, whilst the percentage of age couples and single age people were the lowest groups of poor families. The remaining two categories had an average percentage compared to the highest and lowest family groups.
It is noticeable that 11% of all households in Australians were living in poverty in 1999. The elderly people were the least likely in poverty. The percentage of at 6% and 4 % for single aged people and aged couples respectively.
On the other hand, one out of every five sole parent households was classes as poor that rate was nearly twice higher than of couples with children. In comparison, the poverty rates of single with no children had lower values at 7% that figure was only one third than the percentage of couples with no children at 21%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | farmaniefr@gmail.com | view | |
| 2022-08-08 | whencanIpassIELTsbyscore7 | view | |
| 2021-08-12 | JennyLee | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-29 | Muhammad Hassam Saeed | view | |
| 2021-06-29 | Muhammad Hassam Saeed | view |
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 Summarize the information by describing the main features of the charts and making comparisons where appropriate 20
- the diagrams below give information about two main road tunnels in one Australian city 78
- The following bar charts compares the average age distribution of the population of Scottish in the years 1991 and 2001 Summarize the given information b reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 100
- The table below shows thenumbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 89
- The graph below shows changes in young adult unempolyment rates in England between 1993 and 2012 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table gives information about the pe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty line in Australia in the year 1999. Overall, the percentage of sole parents ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 829.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87647058824 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54921128277 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547058823529 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5505331057 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.625 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117551684141 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630641264307 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600828635402 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907951576249 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647960882381 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.