The pie charts illustrate data about variant age group population in two countries (Yemen and Italy) in the year 2000 and also prediction of these population after 50 years.
Majority of people had 0-14 years old in Yemen in 2000 and teenagers with adults (15-59 years old) by marginal differences grasped the second place among different population. However, old group (60+ years) had the minimum role in population construction. As chart show, after 50 years 15-59 years old people will increase and will be in the first place, kids and children (0-14 years) population will decrease to 37% and old people’s population will soar by 2.1%.
In Italy, majority of population are related to 15-59 years old people in both years, and there will be reverse changes in population of all groups in 2050. On the other hand, old people’s population will increase (from 24.1% to 42.3%), kids and children population will diminish and 15-59 years old people will experience declination.
To sum up, Italy has more old population than Yemen in two relative years, and 0-14 years old population in Yemen is higher than Italy in both years. But, 15-59 years old population in both countries have marginal differences.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 73
- the table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 78
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 an the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this population' or 'these populations'?
Suggestion: this population; these populations
...in the year 2000 and also prediction of these population after 50 years. Majority of people h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, to sum up, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58835855321 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.640228494 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.75 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.375 5.23603664747 217% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172559242125 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102659520626 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750573710774 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148281093212 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747578200218 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.