The table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table given illustrates data regarding the expenditures of consumers based on three categories in five separate nations for the year 2002.
Overall, Sweden's expenses had the lowest when it comes to the first category which was on food, drinks, and tobacco and as well as in the second column which is in the line of clothing and footwear, but, it ranked on the second highest just after the country of Italy when it comes to the third part which is about leisure and education spending. On the other hand, Turkey had the greatest money spent on the first and last categories while following Italy with the maximum expenditure on clothes and shoe-wear.
The first category had an average expenditure of almost 16th percentile to just above 32%. In addition, Turkey had the biggest money spent with just over 32%, followed by Ireland at nearly 29%, Spain by just under 19%, Italy at a little bit over 16%, and Sweden with the least at almost 16%. Then, for the next category, par expenses were between more than five to nine percentage wise. Italy ranked primarily at 9%, followed by Turkey at 6.63%, Spain at 6.51%, Ireland at 6.43%, and Sweden with the smallest amount of 5.4%.
Finally, for the third category, which were spent on hobbies and studied, percentages ranged from nearly 2% to a little over than 4%, where Turkey had taken the most percentile at 4.35%, accompanied by Sweden at 3.22%, Italy at 3.2%, Ireland at 2.21%, and Spain at 1.98%, making it the country with the lowest expenses with regard to this area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | .zin@ | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | MiaMia_8786 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minthu vũ | view | |
| 2023-04-13 | anhminhbnvn1 | 84 | view |
- The table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 11
- The table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 11
- The table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 11
- The table shows the number of nuclear weapons owned by different nations in different years 39
- The table below gives data on tourists visiting in Vietnam from 8 different countries 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...9%, Spain by just under 19%, Italy at a little bit over 16%, and Sweden with the least at ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, regarding, second, then, third, well, while, in addition, as well as, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1271.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77819548872 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32188741622 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522556390977 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.6267973687 43.030603864 222% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 158.875 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.25 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.5 5.23603664747 296% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0499981862474 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301155375188 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477727939987 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0518949612864 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569990832258 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.