The chart below gives the distribution of worldwide car schemes (%) in 2008 and 2016.
The given column graph illustrates the distribution of global car sharing usage (in percentage) by two specific years 2008 and 2016 across six different domains.
Overall, what stand out from the chart is that the trend of car sharing was most popular in Europe during initial year, whereas in last year it became favorable in North America. Furthermore, other areas showed considerably less interest in car sharing.
Firstly, in terms of the most significant feature of the graph, in North America, figure stood at just over 30% in 2008, while after eight years number rose strikingly to around 52%. Secondly, another important point is that the rate of sharing car was declined in Europe from just under 60% to nearly a half that of 2008.
By stark contrast, the least number of car sharing showed in South America, Australia, and Asia. Moreover, there was a slight rise in figure by 2% in these three areas through out the period. The noteable point is that the proportion was stayed under 6% in all these regions during the time span.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The chart below gives the distribution of worldwide car schemes in 2008 and 2016 74
- Some people think that not only should professional sports and cultural enterprises be sponsored by the government but also that amateur adult and children groups should get funding Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support you 84
- Once children start school the teachers have more influence on their intellectual and social development than parents To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- Differences between countries become less evident each year Nowadays all over the world people share the same fashions advertising brands eating habits and TV channels Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of this 92
- The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...se in figure by 2% in these three areas through out the period. The noteable point is that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87640449438 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41426660646 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634831460674 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0024037721 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15191669376 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062051405692 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553307999087 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097107941014 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563966818496 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.