Summarize the table below
The given table describe the changes in 8 modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000
Overall, it is important to note that more distances were covered in the year 2000 as opposed to the year 1985 and people travelled more by car between the given years.
To begin, in year 1985, 3199miles were covered per person using car and it Increased steadily to 4806miles per person in the year 2000, accounting for the highest distance covered in the given table. In contrast, the least distances were covered using bicycles and taxis ( 51 and 13 miles per persons respectively) in 1985, while 41 miles per person was covered using bicycles and 42 miles per person was covered using taxi still accounting for the least on the given table.
Furthermore, in year 2000, people trekked 18miles lesser than they did in year 1985, whereas those travelling by long distance buses rose drastically by covering 70miles more in year 2000 compared to year 1985. In addition train commuters increased steadily covering a distance of 289 miles and 366 miles per person in the year 1985 and 2000 respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-25 | Lethanh54 | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the given table. In contrast, the least distances were covered using bicycles an...
^^
Line 6, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es were covered using bicycles and taxis 51 and 13 miles per persons respectively...
^^
Line 9, column 216, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
... in year 2000 compared to year 1985. In addition train commuters increased steadily cove...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...teadily covering a distance of 289 miles and 366 miles per person in the year 198...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, still, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90374331551 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44054234989 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48128342246 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.2921159594 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 183.4 112.824112599 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.4 22.9334400587 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8 5.23603664747 244% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.014279401944 0.215688989381 7% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00980961179915 0.103423049105 9% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0196192235983 0.0843802449381 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0259288778333 0.15604864568 17% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449101337905 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.2329268293 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.