What is important to understand from the lecture is that the professor disagrees with the advantages of smart cars presented in the reading, namely that smart cars will reduce the number of accidents; that smart cars will reduce commuting times; and that smart cars will save their owners money.
In your response, you should convey the reasons presented by the professor for why smart cars will not produce the benefits predicted in the reading. A high-scoring response will include the following points made by the professor that cast doubt on the points made in the reading
Both the article and the lecture are about the smart car technology. According to the article, there will be many advantage of using smart cars in the future such as, having safer roads, spending less time in the traffic and the drivers will be like passengers since there will be not need for their control. However, the professor argues the points made by the author by claiming that this new smart car technology will not bring that much advancements in our lives.
First of all, the author starts by claiming that the smart car technology will prevent many more traffic accidents. Since those cars will be controlled by the main operator, this system will eliminate accidents. However, the professor argues this statement by saying that even sometimes electronic devices make mistakes and giving the fact that many cars will be controlled from one monitor, when an accident occurs, the involvement of cars will be with a great number and this situation might be resulted with a huge disaster.
Secondly, according to the author, within the smart car innovation, people will be spending less time in traffic. This is because computer-controlled cars follow each other with the same program system, therefore the highway speed can be increased, and this will be results with less time spending in the traffic. In contrast, the professor mentions that this development will not likely to be happened, she adds that history has been proofed from the past developments that, many people will want to experience driving smart cars and this will be resulted having many more cars in the traffic and furthermore, there will not be that much change than nowadays, in terms of spending time in traffic.
Finally, the article says that the travel cost will be reduced since the most routes will be direct and there will be no need for changes of breaks or tires. On the other hand, the professor deputes this statement by saying, this high technology smart car developments are quite expensive, adding additional such as sensors and the other technological devices to the smart cars will be resulted with spending much more money to the repairmen than the usual cars require.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-01 | mubeccel2020 | 73 | view |
- Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile s main source of power the internal combustion engine 3
- Some people think that music plays an important role in society Others thinks it is simply a form of entertainment 77
- Some people think history has little or nothing to offer while others say the study of the past helps understand the present 84
- Some believe that it is good having people with extremely high income in the country while some think the government should try to limit it Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- a Four day workweek 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun advantage seems to be countable; consider using: 'many advantages'.
Suggestion: many advantages
...According to the article, there will be many advantage of using smart cars in the future such ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...mart car technology will not bring that much advancements in our lives. First of ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., she adds that history has been proofed from the past developments that, many pe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, even so, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 5.04856512141 456% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 363.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00550964187 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57001318762 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465564738292 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 542.7 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.1766101457 49.2860985944 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 165.181818182 110.228320801 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 21.698381199 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0909090909 7.06452816374 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372195416534 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201373094654 0.0996497079465 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456898929717 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290729582777 0.162205337803 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287840527652 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.3589403974 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.