in order to increase the quality of education, it is necessary for universities to spend more money as a salary of professors
Education, as we all know, for the majority of governments, becomes a controversial issue. Due to the paramount importance of education on people's life, efforts for elevating its effectiveness have always been among the top priorities of pundits. In this regard, many believe that in order to increase the quality of education it is necessary for universities to spend more money as a salary of professors. Likewise, I believe that the advantages of increasing professors’ salary outweigh its disadvantages. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that the instructors' salary should increase related to their emotional circumstances that can be boosted if they have enough money. Undoubtedly, money becomes a very significant factor in the modern lifestyle. Money describes many things about a person like social position, welfare, and amenity accessibility, and so on. As it told before," money talks". So, what would happen to a professor if they did not earn enough money? Needless to say, their emotional health endangered and deteriorated. Take my personal experience as an example. One of the professors of mine, that was very famous exposed to the harsh economic condition during his last year of teaching. Not only did his behavior worse but his mood was down that led us to cannot focus on lessons well. Although many critics may challenge this idea and debate that the monetary circumstances cannot have an influence on a professor's mood, quite a few evidence that evaluates professors in different monetary conditions and their reaction to the challenges they face show otherwise. In conclusion, for elevating the quality of a class the good mood of a professor is required which attain by professors' better monetary circumstances.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is the condition that money provides which leads a professor to be updated. In other words, through better income, an instructor has enough money to take part in classes to improve his knowledge. Without a doubt, by the advent of technology, the process of science inventions increases remarkably, thus it is critical for a teacher to keep in touch with the most recent explorations or theories. This would not be achieved unless professors have the chance to participate in related classes. This participation not only brings them up-to-date information but also helps them to communicate with professors of other majors that can lead to a collaboration that results in interdisciplinary scientific research. Scientifically speaking, teachers who try to learn news, show more productivity. The performance of their students, on the other hand, is noticeable.
To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we can safely conclude that both the relief money provide for a professor and the encouragement it has, all in all shows the importance of raise in salary of the professors.
- When you face difficult problems in life what do you feel is the best way to solve them 73
- During our careers we work with many different kinds of people All of them have unique characteristics and personality traits In your opinion which of the following is the most important characteristic of a coworker A serious attitude regarding their work 76
- around the world people are living longer than ever before Which of the following do you think are the main causes of this phenomenon You may choose more than one option 43
- The people we work with have many different characteristics and all of them affect the quality of our time at work Of the following what do you think is the most important quality for a boss or supervisor to have 90
- It is better for students to learn concepts rather than facts 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'instructors'' or 'instructor's'?
Suggestion: instructors'; instructor's
... that makes me hold the belief that the instructors salary should increase related to their...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...essibility, and so on. As it told before,' money talks'. So, what would happ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 942, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...umstances cannot have an influence on a professors mood, quite a few evidence that evaluat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 967, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun evidence seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little evidence'.
Suggestion: little evidence
...influence on a professors mood, quite a few evidence that evaluates professors in different ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...professor to be updated. In other words, through better income, an instructor has...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, likewise, may, so, thus, well, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2504.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 470.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32765957447 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19450920958 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56170212766 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 794.7 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2887092258 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.333333333 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.20833333333 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358697534819 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840126303946 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130601697555 0.0737576698707 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211962107491 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131655652925 0.0645574589148 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.