Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer
nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the
responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their
citizens themselves?
The GDP in each country may indicate that a country is in the wealthy or poor category. There are many wealthy nations in the world besides the poorer nations. The crucial point is the wealthier nations should not support the other nations directly by giving food or education. My opinion is about the government should take care of their own country to develop accurately.
The first argument is each country has different heritage and natural materials. Therefore, using the same method from developed countries may not help the underdeveloped countries very well. Depending on their conditions, the government in poor countries will suppose to plan a strategy to improve the economy. For example, in Arab nations, the government can utilize the oil export to build up their economy but people can not use these conditions on some other countries without oil assets like Cambodia or Laos.
Secondly, each country has particular cultural aspects and their government know exactly what to do to help themself. That is to say, the government have to help the economy and the quality of their citizen life by using the proper plan on their nation. To illustrate that, the government of Canada might encourage people using wood to build houses. It is one of the best ways to protect the environment instead of using artificial materials. By contrast, depending on the hot climate regions in Vietnam, people should be encouraged to use brick which made in clay to build their houses. It is definitely suitable for its budget and local material supplies. That is meant the government in each country should demonstrate their role by suggesting a suitable plan to help their nations rising perfectly.
In conclusion, I believe that the government has a crucial role to support their people and the economic development in a proper way by using particular methods and suitable plan.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-06 | Shohista | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-30 | niloya | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-31 | ishanimody | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-21 | sattar_iust | 75 | view |
| 2020-12-20 | vsundar | 73 | view |
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 73
- Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more important than the Inte 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...eir people and the economic development in a proper way by using particular methods and suitabl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09677419355 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69554880325 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512903225806 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5230556464 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.75 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247060393239 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913248286143 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894583291869 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156749312467 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980733312056 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.