Every human on this planet requires basic resources such as food, shelter and water for their survival. Some people opine that wealthy nations should lend their support by sharing resources such as food and education, while others argue it is a government task to look after their citizens. In my view, the developed countries should support the poor if they are scarcity of natural resources in their country.
To begin with, without any doubt, the elected government of a country should be responsible to take care of the well-being citizens. The authorities must work with their officials and experts to focus on economic and infrastructure development to improve the social status and life style of the people. In addition, they must also have long-term vision and disaster recovery plans so that authorities do not have to rely on the other countries when there is a crisis. Ensuring the quality education, job opportunity, and healthcare to the countrymen are fundamental rights and commitments from the ruling people. Lack of planning will result in poor education and low standard of living.
On the other hand, not all countries can do this without the support of rich nations either because they are in lack of natural resources to do or widespread corruption or unforeseen natural calamities. In such cases, the first-class nation to extend their support to underdeveloped countries. Being said that, there are lot of wealthy countries are wasting a staggering amount of food while millions of citizens from poor country such as Asia and Africa continents are starving for food and most of the time they go to bed in empty stomach. This is inhuman and should not happen when we equally created but not equally prevailed. Therefore, a small support in education and development from advanced nations to weaker society will create a bigger change in their society and attitude. Perhaps, these kinds of humanitarian actions or social reliefs create a strong bonding between the continents to reduce border tension and crime rates in their home country. For example, a joint force of well developed nations has funded African countries like Somalia, Nigeria etc., continuously to fight against their poverty. Without their help, the government is unable to supply the basic needs for their people.
To conclude, rich countries should help the poor nations only if the later do not have abundant natural resources to support their people. If they have surplus resources then it’s should be their concern government accountability to handle their issues as part of their internal affairs.
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives Which viewpoint do you agree with
- Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on your children Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 73
- You and your family are living in rented accommodation in an English speaking country You are not satisfied with the condition of some of the furniture Write a letter to the landlord In your letter introduce yourself explain what is wrong with the fur
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we needmusic Is the traditional music of a country more important than theInternational music that is heard everywhere nowadays You should write at least 250 words Use your own ideas kno 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, such as, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2184.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 421.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18764845606 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69702805212 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522565320665 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 662.4 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7143152528 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3888888889 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319536512044 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104660206102 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844156297725 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21431138095 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842121780629 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.