When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Undoubtedly, people, specifically students and professors, are divided into differing opinions considering the controversial issue of whether it is more effective for students to learn while working on assignments in groups or alone. My personal point of view stands for group projects to be more beneficial. In the subsequent essay I will support my standpoint.
First and foremost, I believe that social interaction that results from working in groups is extremely decisive for both students’ communicative skills and the studying process by itself. Not only this will allow youngsters create closer relationship, but also enable them to perceive the information quiet differently. In this case, the environment is incomparably more relaxed, which has such advantages as merely much more fun and interesting study time. Experience from my own life set a compelling example of this. In the middle school, I used to hate the science class, because it happened to be difficult for me to keep up with the class. Nevertheless, now I am extremely grateful to my teacher who organized her classes in a very playful manner, which included playing quizzes right during the lessons and also making group projects and presentation. I am convinced that the latter encouraged me to study better, as I sincerely enjoyed working on the assignments with my best friends.
Moreover, another reason that substantiate my opinion is that using this method pupils can actually obtain useful skills for their future careers. It cannot be denied that, sooner or later, the preponderance of them will end up working for companies or have their own business. In any case, interaction with co-workers and other people will be inevitable. Working in a group can merely provide a chance to analyze your own personal characteristics, which is also crucial for the career. Again, from the same experience I had in the middle school, I realized that I tended to play the role of a leader without even making an effort to do that. This facilitated my understanding considering my strengths.
On the other hand, I simultaneously assume that this may not necessarily work for everyone. Unarguably there are individuals who prefer accomplishing assignments by themselves, for the have full control over the progress.
To sum up, I personally suppose that teachers should assign group projects. They can be beneficial for students’ relationships and academic performance. At the same time, however, it is important to note that this approach is presumably not suitable for everyone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A zoo has no useful purpose Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer 7
- Rembrandt 81
- Theories of Little Ice Age Causes 90
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, in any case, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2160.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30712530713 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11644200313 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584766584767 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3848423633 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.857142857 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.380952381 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.80952380952 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178731822008 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505097507804 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570553178761 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109605921673 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617190968964 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.