Would you prefer to live in a traditional house or in a modern apartment building?
Traditional and classical houses are experiencing a new wave of popularity. People are divided into differing opinions considering whether an apartment or a house is more comfortable to live in. If I had to choose, I would presumably choose living in a traditional house for its several advantages.
First and foremost, personally for me it is extremely uncomfortable and inconvenient to live in small rooms. While some people actually like it, for me it is rather frightening. I believe that it is crucial for a residence to be not necessarily large, but at least wide and have sufficient space to adorn it neatly, according to the owners’ palate. The experience of living for a few months in Hong Kong made me realize the vitality of this factor. Due to enormous rent prices, I had no choice but to live in a modern apartment building. Although the facilities were great and I generally enjoyed staying there, tiny rooms, impossibly thin walls did not allow me feeling like home, because of mere lack of privacy. Therefore, I actually started appreciating what I had living in a house in my hometown.
In addition, another huge benefit of living in a traditional house is undoubtedly having your own lawn and garden. Not only do I find it really pleasant and amusing to work there, creating amazing land shafts, but also it is very enjoyable to be able to spend your time in a natural environment whenever you want. My own life sets a compelling instance of this. Undeniably, in the current situation in the world correlated with the virus, people’s primary problems are their health and health of their close people and not how much time they can spend breathing fresh air. Nonetheless, in this state of emergency my family moved in our summer cottage. Listening to my friends’ complaints considering the fact that they cannot even go out somewhere initiated me feel lucky for simply having an opportunity to see and enjoy all the green.
On the other hand, however, it is also worth noting that apartments are usually more suitable and affordable for the preponderance of population, specifically those people who live in big cities. Besides that, in modern world apartment buildings and skyscrapers are getting more widespread. This forms better facilities and convenient environment around these building.
To sum up, my firm belief stands for living in your own house, as it is much more enjoyable and secures one’s personal space. Simultaneously, apartments remain a preferred option for the majority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-18 | kevin220804 | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-18 | kevin220804 | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-09 | maya14 | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | sandiphinge86@gmail.com | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | alta | 70 | view |
- A zoo has no useful purpose 81
- Benefits of cloud seeding 60
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 76
- Dinosaurs 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A zoo has no useful purpose Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer 7
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to live'.
Suggestion: to live
...ad to choose, I would presumably choose living in a traditional house for its several ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, however, if, nonetheless, really, so, therefore, while, at least, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2113.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04295942721 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94419050956 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599045346062 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8789981749 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.619047619 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9523809524 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275285624926 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762076239497 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777720863302 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150167330187 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830053594077 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.