Would you prefer to live in a traditional house or in a modern apartment building? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice.
Where you live is one of the crucial aspects that make your life happy. For me, if I had a chance to choose where I live, I would definitely prefer to live in a traditional house. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, living a conventional house provides us experience real nature compared to modern buildings. In other words, we can grow our favourite flowers or even vegetables in our garden which near our house. I have to admit that my opinions on this matter have been profoundly influenced by my own experience. When I was a little, I really loved going to my grandparent’s house during the summer break. That was the great moment for my entire life because it was the only place I can intricate with real nature and escape from a busy big city. Every night I could see thousands of stars from my backyard while lying on the grasses without any car signals or shouting noise. In contrast, my city home is completely surrounded by skyscrapers and I cannot see the sunset in some situation from my apartment.
On top of this, in a traditional house, you do not need to rely on others because there are no people who live above or under you. To be more specific, if your neighbours celebrate events or even argue with each other, they cannot disturb you easily like in apartments. Drawing from my own experience, after I graduated from college, I was offered a decent job in a big city. First, I rented a fair apartment near my job and I hoped that everything would be okay. However, ever since I arrived in this building, my annoying neighbours did not give a chance to sleep well due to their super noisy parties and their baby’s crying. I did not even imagine how slim the walls of this apartment. It indeed affected my job productivity a lot and I could not bear even longer. It goes without saying that my previous parent’s house was incredibly calm and I did not have to worry about whether I could sleep in the night. Therefore, living in a modern flat is a huge challenge for anyone who wants to live quietly.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that living in a traditional house is far better than in contemporary buildings. This is because it allows you to live in pure nature and this is because it does not require you to depend on others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-05 | alta | 70 | view |
| 2019-06-23 | Reet_@ | 75 | view |
| 2018-09-25 | mardanpour | 84 | view |
| 2018-06-07 | jonitagandhi | 60 | view |
| 2018-06-07 | jonitagandhi | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Advertising can tell you a lot about a country. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Many people visit museums when they travel to new places. Why do you think people visit museums? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 30. THE BURNING MIRROR 83
- Eco certification vs not. TPO7 integrated writing 3
- Fuel-cell engine over internal-combation engin 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Where you live is one of the crucial aspects ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, really, so, therefore, well, while, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1915.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49530516432 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67049603545 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546948356808 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6653060877 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.1904761905 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7619047619 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167787074175 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538298806527 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616284724415 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12461763246 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531563092747 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.