The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Human developed the machine to solve the complex and intricate problems of society. Machines made human life easier and provided lots of comfort to a human being. The prompt recommends that the human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are produced by the human mind. In my opinion, I do not agree with the statement because of the following reasons.
To begin with, by definition machines are the one which makes human life easier by solving the existed problem. Indeed there is a human mind behind every machine's invention, but it doesn't mean than the human mind is more powerful than the machine. For example, we invented the calculator so we can solve the intricate problem in a fraction of the time. However, we can't say that the human mind is better than a calculator because we just provided the logic behind the basic calculation, but its machine capacity to handle the intricate task. As human beings, we may face some restrictions in computing or analyzing tasks while machines did not have such restrictions. Moreover, no human mind can compete with today's supercomputer computation. The above example illustrates that human capacity is limited to basic logic development while machines have more power in terms of handling the complex task. Therefore, the possibility of humans having a more powerful mind than machines doesn't exist.
Furthermore, with the technological advancements machines are becoming more and more powerful than the human mind. At the same time, it seems that humans are losing their intelligence in some ways. For instance, the first computer wasn't able to perform the task like today's supercomputer, like analyzing the myriad of data and interpreting the outcome. The human mind can't store that much big size of data in the mind and produce the results which today's analysis software provides. Consequently, humans will never try to do anything like this because they made machines for such jobs. Hence, the development of the human mind will remain restricted yet humans will try to improve the machine to solve a more profound task. The above examples demonstrate that humans are indirectly making machines smarter than ever before. Thus, humans mind is bounded by the innate limitation while the machine has the flexibility to improve, so machines would be smarter than human minds.
Some may argue that humans have the intelligence and ability to think which machines do not have. However, in today's artificial intelligence era machines are becoming self-intelligent, humans made the machine that can think and take the action accordingly. Moreover, humans are making this technology more and more sophisticated each day. Hence, there will be a time when one artificial robot will be more powerful than the human being.
All things considering, it's feasible to assert that humans not only developed the machine nut also made it such a power that it becomes the way more intelligent than humanity itself. The day is not far away when machines will be able to think like humans. Because humans have some physical and mental limitations while a machine doesn't follow such limitation. Therefore, we can not say that the human mind is more superior to the machine.
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge 66
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition 50
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority 54
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
... easier by solving the existed problem. Indeed there is a human mind behind every mach...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'machines'' or 'machine's'?
Suggestion: machines'; machine's
...deed there is a human mind behind every machines invention, but it doesnt mean than the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...behind every machines invention, but it doesnt mean than the human mind is more powerf...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... in a fraction of the time. However, we cant say that the human mind is better than ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 981, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ving a more powerful mind than machines doesnt exist. Furthermore, with the techno...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... ways. For instance, the first computer wasnt able to perform the task like todays su...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...ter wasnt able to perform the task like todays supercomputer, like analyzing the myria...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nterpreting the outcome. The human mind cant store that much big size of data in the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 976, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ines would be smarter than human minds. Some may argue that humans have the inte...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...smarter than human minds. Some may argue that humans have the intelligence and a...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 91, Rule ID: NUT_NOT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'not'?
Suggestion: not
...t humans not only developed the machine nut also made it such a power that it becom...
^^^
Line 9, column 330, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... and mental limitations while a machine doesnt follow such limitation. Therefore, we c...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2707.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 529.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11720226843 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79583152331 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70067563648 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.427221172023 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 886.5 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7085927673 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.6785714286 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8928571429 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 10.2758426966 204% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.58159562364 0.243740707755 239% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204017530044 0.0831039109588 245% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142940089076 0.0758088955206 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.427296175541 0.150359130593 284% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11143676514 0.0667264976115 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
... easier by solving the existed problem. Indeed there is a human mind behind every mach...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'machines'' or 'machine's'?
Suggestion: machines'; machine's
...deed there is a human mind behind every machines invention, but it doesnt mean than the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...behind every machines invention, but it doesnt mean than the human mind is more powerf...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... in a fraction of the time. However, we cant say that the human mind is better than ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 981, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ving a more powerful mind than machines doesnt exist. Furthermore, with the techno...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... ways. For instance, the first computer wasnt able to perform the task like todays su...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...ter wasnt able to perform the task like todays supercomputer, like analyzing the myria...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nterpreting the outcome. The human mind cant store that much big size of data in the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 976, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ines would be smarter than human minds. Some may argue that humans have the inte...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...smarter than human minds. Some may argue that humans have the intelligence and a...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 91, Rule ID: NUT_NOT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'not'?
Suggestion: not
...t humans not only developed the machine nut also made it such a power that it becom...
^^^
Line 9, column 330, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... and mental limitations while a machine doesnt follow such limitation. Therefore, we c...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2707.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 529.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11720226843 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79583152331 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70067563648 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.427221172023 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 886.5 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7085927673 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.6785714286 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8928571429 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 10.2758426966 204% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.58159562364 0.243740707755 239% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204017530044 0.0831039109588 245% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142940089076 0.0758088955206 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.427296175541 0.150359130593 284% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11143676514 0.0667264976115 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.