The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table gives information that indicates social and economic aspects for Canada, Japan, Peru and Angola in 1994, sourced by United Nations statistics. Overall, it can be seen from the figure that Japan has the highest number of earning per person and life expectancy at birth, whereas calorie supply reaches the highest number in Canada. However, Canada and Japan are countries with the most number in adult literacy equally.
Yearly wages are counted in US dollars. Japan stands the highest with the number of 15760. Coming second is Canada with a difference of less than 5000. But Peru and Angola drop significantly to less than 200. The countries ranks of the next indicator, life expected at born child, stay the same. All numbers are below 100.
On the other side, numbers that shows the day-to-day calorie stock each individuals are about 1749-3326. Canadian has the highest number of calories followed by Japan. Angola still remains last as in the other 3 indicators. Lastly, Canadian and Japan's grown up literacy rate has the similar numbers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-19 | mickaelaelaine | 64 | view |
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994 according to United Nations statistics Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
- The chart below show the percentage of students joining North West University 83
- The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- The diagram below shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'rank'.
Suggestion: rank
...icantly to less than 200. The countries ranks of the next indicator, life expected at...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, second, so, still, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08620689655 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38616509387 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655172413793 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4366845205 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.0769230769 112.824112599 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.3846153846 22.9334400587 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0972065962885 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338473783262 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763052517499 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.063229305811 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572637256463 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.65 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.