The diagram below shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town.
The picture illustrates how the collection of rainwater for drinking usage in an Australian town is done. Overall, it can be seen from the figure that there are 5 main process turning rainwater to drinking water.
First, rainwater from the cloud goes down and inside the drain. The waters in the drain from each houses then are filtered through water filter. After it is done, the filtered water will be transferred with the help of pipes to a tank to storage it. Next, the water that has been storaged moves to another place to get treatment. In this specific tank, the water will be combined with chemicals in order to make sure the water is drinkable. Finally, once the chemicals and water are mixtured well, the water will then be served in each houses via the tap available. If the drinking water drops into the sink, it will also go back to the cycle of being filtered.
- The chart below show the percentage of students joining North West University 83
- The diagram below shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 78
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994 according to United Nations statistics Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 722.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59872611465 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31088209826 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605095541401 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.824937449 43.030603864 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.2222222222 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263514016269 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119204601485 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128493984745 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274408607136 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145104397885 0.0819641961636 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.