The charts below give information about the electricity generation in the two countries in 2009
The given pie charts compare the proportional rate of electricity produced(in KWH) from different resources: conventional, renewable, and nuclear in Germany and France in the year 2009.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that Germany was ahead of France in the total production of electricity during the given period. The former country used conventional thermal as the major resource, while the latter fulfilled the maximum proportion from the nuclear resource. Although biomass was more popular in Germany in the renewable sector, France was using more nuclear energy.
According to the given illustration, out of the total 560 billion kWh of electricity produced in Germany, 59.6% was generated from conventional resources, higher by multiple of 6 than France. On the contrary, France, whose total production was less by 50 billion KWH, generated nearly three-fourth of power from nuclear resources, just one-third(23%) produced in Germany.
On the other hand, Germany accounted for 17.4% of renewable resources, higher by 3.7% from France. About 39.3% of the biomass was used in Germany, nearly five times higher than France. In contrast, more than three-fourths of the energy was contributed from hydroelectric in France as compared to just 17.7% in Germany. In addition, Germany used nearly three times more wind energy than in France(10.5%). Also, solar energy accounted for 6.1% in Germany and only 0.9% in France. However, both countries were not dependent on geothermal energy at all.
- The charts below show the males and females arrested over 5 years and the reasons for the most recent arrests 84
- The users of social media such as Facebook and Twitter are replacing face to face contact in this century Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The map below is of the town of Canterbury A new school S is planned for the area The map shows two possible sites for the school Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below give information about the electricity generation in the two countries in 2009 73
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s generated from conventional resources, higher by multiple of 6 than France. On ...
^^
Line 6, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y accounted for 6.1% in Germany and only 0.9% in France. However, both countries ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, third, while, in addition, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49787234043 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90696545672 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527659574468 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8410336788 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0880126623083 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350944812851 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370157473664 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654704825085 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036062487688 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.