The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012.
The diagrams illustrate the similarities and differences of Frenton in the 1990-2012 period. In general, while there were not any accommodations be demolished during these years, some facilities were replaced and built in 2012.
Regarding similarities, a school which was located in the Northern left corner of Frenton was maintained throughout this period. Likewise, there was a library situated on the left side of the High Street, which was in the middle of Frenton. In addition, a hospital by the library was maintained, whereas, it was broadened all dimensions.
Looking at the diagram in more detail, it is noticeable that houses and playing fields with trees were replaced with blocks of flats in 2012. Also, café and park were converted into a hotel and golf course, which was surrounded by flats on the North, cinema, and supermarket in lieu of theatre and shops in 1990. On the left side of the High Street, a bank, which was located next to the hospital, was knocked down and a restaurant was constructed in this space. Trees on the South were cut down and a technopark was built.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-18 | paula_ngy08 | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-14 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-08 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
- Wild animals have no use in the 21st century and trying to preserve animals now is just wastage of resources 84
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies 78
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 67
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period 73
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, look, regarding, so, whereas, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92972972973 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78320119855 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556756756757 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9436231778 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0988130259175 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580385405795 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915997506947 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898410349339 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728042400875 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.