Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students. Do you think its advantages will outweigh the disadvantages?
Some intellectuals from the education field reckon that learners can take advantage of participating in overseas programs. Despite those programs’ disadvantages, I believe that this practice has effective merits that profoundly outweigh.
On the one hand, the obvious challenge of studying abroad for adolescents is the culture shock and the expensiveness of various exchange programs. An international exchange program is likely to be more expensive than a domestic course. This can be elaborated by the fact that students from developing nations would find it is unaffordable and inaccessible to follow an educational program in first-world countries. To share the financial burden on their family, they have to work part-time jobs and it might affect the students’ academic results. Secondly, even with preparation and knowledge about the new environment, adolescents could still experience cultural dissimilarities ranging from food, languages, lifestyle, and so on. For example, students from Asian countries seem unable to be in harmony with codes of behavior set by Europeans and vice versa. This, consequently, would make them fall behind with their studies.
On the other hand, I believe that the benefits are more significant than the aforementioned disadvantages. Participating in an international network, students would have an attractive resume which is valuable for them in the years to come. By working in foreign organizations, they will gain practical experience that makes their profile more competitive. Another reason is that studying abroad also encourages independence for teenagers. As a consequence, this will develop independent thinking and decision-making skill, which are useful for their future. Additionally, after finishing the program, they can develop their social skills by sharing their experiences with other exchange students and get a deeper insight into the culture by immersing themselves in the local community.
In conclusion, although international exchange for school students might give them hurdles to face in adapting to the new culture, I would maintain that this trend has more benefits therefore teenagers should be encouraged to participate in these programs.
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 61
- The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 2012 82
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it a positive or negative development 84
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing themselves in the local community. In conclusion, although international ex...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78353658537 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24976403985 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594512195122 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4781754287 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5625 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235532288381 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694414298564 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518369827813 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140270570775 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487132784039 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.