Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays, it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together.
A family where children are brought up is one of the critical components of a society. Because the people’s characteristics are formed in a family, it plays a very crucial role in the public. Unfortunately, nowadays, the number of relatives is reduced, and it is less enjoyable for people to spend time with their families, so most of the time, people take their meals alone. Not only are the daily plans of relatives different, but also today’s families are not close-knit. In the following paragraphs, I will shed light on my reasons for this viewpoint.
Because today’s people usually have to work or study, daily schedules probably are more diverse than ever, and they are seldom at home. Mothers even have to work to help the economic situation of families. Because of the proliferation of population, there is a competition between people to occupy careers. Consequently, we have to make more efforts and spend more time at work to not be laid off. For example, in my family, all of us are captured by a busy lifestyle, so my father usually gets back home early, and we are together for the minority of the day. Moreover, we have to have dinners at work or universities, for the working offices or universities are farther away from houses than before. We accustomed to this situation, so even at weekends, barely do we have dinners jointly. On the other hand, in the past, because of the nearness of working place like farms to houses, they get back home and have dinners with family. As a result, these days, we frequently eat meals without our relatives, for we have a busy daily schedule.
Unfortunately, the connection between today’s family members is not powerful, and most people do not live in a close-knit family. Because the number of kin is reduced, the relationship between them is often widely separated. On the other hand, in the past, a family includes grandparents, aunts, and uncles with which they share a small space; therefore, they intentionally or unintentionally communicate with each other regularly during the day. Although present-day houses are more capacious than the earlier ones, most of the families are nuclear, which means they include only parents and children who are almost always in their rooms. For another reason, technology leads people to be lonely, so we pass the days while watching the display of cellphones or personal computers alone. For instance, when family members gather around a table and want to have meals, the television is usually on; therefore, nobody brings up a subject about which relatives talk, which makes people do not have an enjoyable time. As a result, because of the low quality of the relationship between relatives, people prefer to have meals with their friends, rather than their siblings or parents.
In conclusion, it is not plausible for people to have meals with their family because not only are today’s families disjointed, but also people are more occupied than before. The society is made up of numerous families. Only if there are many adorable families will the community have a brighter future. I suggest that people spend more time with their family instead of using cellphones. Either traveling or going to a restaurant with family is a good idea to overcome this affair.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The government should support scientific research even if there s no practical use 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Newspapers and magazines are the best methods to learn about a foreign country 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to succeed you should be more like others than be different from everyone else 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together 73
- You have long been friend with someone If they do something that you don t like should you still be friends with him or her 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2729.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 550.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96181818182 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77766118396 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469090909091 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 889.2 618.680645161 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8590515275 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.961538462 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11538461538 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286107334217 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080012867567 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531457775383 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193440639295 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369360969867 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.